Архив на категория: Учители

Зелена класна стая/Зелено училище

В България сродните на този подход имат незаслужено малко известност. Сред тях има индивидуални, за които знаят само учителите и учениците в клъса/училището и малко по-организирани като Био-градинските в детски градини и училища, в които гражданска организация предоставя семена и знанието за отглеждане на растенията.

Ето и едни кратък филм от най-зле справящото се училище в Бронкс (Ню Йорк), където инициативата е започнала със семената за цветя получени по пощата от учителя и няколко саксии в класната стая и днес – училището има има цяла градина за зеленчуци и цветя, които децата отглеждат и носят вкъщи.

 

Образователна реформа – как се прави? Случаят Сингапур.

Кратко описание на образователна реформа започнала през 1997 и завършена през 2010. Представена заедно резултати проверими по данни от 2015. Има красива име „По-малко преподаване, повече научаване“.

Особено полезни акценти за българските активни в образованието професионалисти и граждани:

  1. Ясни цели, известни на всички – вкл. родителите и учениците – и преследвани от всички за дълъг период. Независимо от политическия цикъл.
  2. Автономията на училищата и подкрепата за учителите. Промяната става отдолу-нагоре. Подкрепата за промяната върви отгоре-надолу.
  3. Техните цели са постигнати само с 10% освобождаване на учебно време за новите занимания и само с 20% освобождаване на проф. време на учителите, за да направят дизайна на новите занимания. А целите са съществени. И българските деца също имат нужда училището им да преследва такива цели.
  4. Мащабите! Въпреки, че са се подготвили по-добре от нас и разполагат с повече ресурси, в Сингапур започват прилагането на реформата в …..29 училища. Никога в историята на българските реформи и преди и след 1989 г. не сме избирали правилния мащаб. У нас винаги нововъведенията се започват в 100% от училищата. И веднага започваме да „поправяме“ още незавършени промени, заради грешки в мащаба на въвеждане (липса на достатъчно средства, липса на достатъчна подготовка, недооценена местна специфика и т.н.)

Директорите на добирте училища имат всяко от качествата, които в Харвад смятат за „най-важни“ за успешното управление в съвременната епоха

От списание Мениджър

8-те най-важни лидерски черти според „Харвард“

Управленските структури в компаниите днес са много различни спрямо тези преди 20 години, най-вече заради средния мениджмънт.

Това смята Рей Карви – изпълнителен вицепрезидент корпоративни науки в Harvard Business Publishing, филиал на бизнес училището към университета „Харвард“ в САЩ. Карви описва съвременния свят на бизнеса като „изменчив, несигурен, много сложен и неясен“. По думите му е от решаващо значение човек да бъде продуктивен в днешните времена.

Harvard Business Publishing наскоро издаде доклад, озаглавен „Лидерство сега: Критично важни способности за един сложен свят“. Според доклада, има 8 ключови умения, които лидерите днес трябва да притежават, за да бъдат успешни. Те са следните:

1. Управляват сложното и обърканото. Ако го умеят, те са способни да разрешават проблеми и да вземат решения в условия на много бързо променящи се мениджмънт системи, посочват от „Харвард“. Дори преди да бъде налична каквато и да е точна информация, ефективните лидери оценяват сложността на ситуацията и избират подходящ курс на действие.

2. Ръководят глобален бизнес. Преди 10 години това условие едва ли би било включено в списъка, посочва Карви, но днес то е факт. Много е важно да се разбират глобалните пазари и да се осъзнава, че компанията се намира в тях. Лидерите трябва да поддържат глобален начин на мислене ежедневно. В това се включва умението да търсят и оценяват какво се случва с клиентите, конкурентите, икономиката и политиката на пазарите, в които те искат техния бизнес да оперира, продължава докладът.

3. Всяко тяхно действие е стратегическо. Ако глобалното мислене е нещо задължително, стратегическото е необходимост. Старите практики в мениджмънта залагаха на развитието на дългосрочни стратегии, а в днешния свят се иска по-продължителен процес: лидерите трябва винаги да бъдат подготвени да променят стратегиите си и да ги пригаждат, така че да хващат нововъзникнали възможности, или за да се справят с неочаквани предизвикателства.

4. Подхранват почва за възникване на иновации. С увеличаващото се равнище на конкуренцията „никоя стратегия не може да задържи компанията конкурентна за вечни времена“, посочват авторите. Колкото и да е успешно нещо днес, винаги може да има акцент върху иновациите. Добрите лидери знаят това и са фокусирани постоянно върху издигането на бизнеса до следващия му етап на развитие.

5. Работят за контакти. Те оценяват по-високо нетуъркинга от напредъка в собствената си кариера. Създаването на контакти разглеждат като начин да спечели цялата компания и да се създават връзки с клиенти, доставчици, стратегически партньори, дори с конкуренти. Както и да се използват връзките, успешните лидери днес трябва да демонстрират талант за сътрудничество, смятат от „Харвард“.

6. С действията си вдъхновяват другите повече да бъдат свързани и ангажирани с компанията. Това е от абсолютно решаващо значение. По този начин лидерът създава сред служителите чувство за стойност. Просто да бъде задържан на работа екипът не е правилната цел. Хората може да останат на работа с години, но няма да създадат стойност за организацията, ако не са заинтересовани от работата си. Работа на лидера е да съумее да убеди служителите си, че правят нещо ценно и важно. Ако няма такова убеждение, има проблем.

7. Развили са лично умение да се приспособяват бързо към новите ситуации. Отново се подчертава колко е важно да бъде разбирана непрекъснатата промяна в бизнеса. Нещо, което може да е работило брилянтно в миналото, днес може вече да не работи. Адаптивните лидери са наясно, че подходът „както винаги сме го правили“ не е добър, дори додегашните практики да са донесли ползи. Разглеждат реалността с отворен ум, за да доловят и да се възползват от ценните възможности.

8. Създават среда за бързо учене. Гъвкавостта при ученето на нови неща е нещо, с което почти всеки служител днес се бори. Бизнесът и моделите за работа много бързо еволюират. Добрите лидери поемат инициативата в откриването на възможности хората да се учат. Измислят нови подходи, използват техники, оприличавани на подхода в rapid prototyping (набор от техники в 3D моделирането, използвани за да се изфабрикува бързо триизмерен модел на физически обект, или за да се сглоби триизмерен компютърен дизайн – б.р.). Освен това, отделят време, за да обмислят опита си досега и да изведат кое в него се е оказало успешно и кое – не.

Речник на учителите от 21 в.

Един проект за постоянно актуализиращ се индекс на системите и методите за учене.

Learning Models, Theories, and Technology: A Dictionary For 21st Century Teachers

by Terry Heick and TeachThought Staff

Purpose: Improving our chance for a common language in discussing existing and emerging learning trends, model, and technology in hopes of innovation in classrooms, and collectively, education at large.

Audience: K-12 & higher ed educators, researchers, institutions, and organizations globally.

Form: An index of learning models, theories, forms, terminology, technology, and research to help you keep up with the latest trends in 21st century learning. This page was created and is updated by Terry Heick and TeachThought Staff, who you cancontact directly with suggestions for terms, improved citations, corrections, or additions to the index.

Revisions: Persistently updated. In addition to new definitions, models, and strategies, citations and references will also be added periodically, as will updates, corrections, edits, and revisions.

Ed note: As stated, this is an ambitious work in progress that we’re choosing to share as we proof, revise, iterate, and generally improve for wider dissemination. When you find typos, dead links, missing sentences, inconsistencies, or flat out lies, let us know. ; ^ )

Ed note 2: If you’d like to help update and improve this page, and have the background, curiosity, and/or expertise to contribute, email me. I’ve got 36 terms and 19 revisions that need adding already. I’m only one person. ; ^ )

A Dictionary For 21st Century Teachers: Learning Models & Technology

1:1

A description of a learning environment where there is one “screen” for each student (whether an iPad, laptop, etc.)

Activity-Based Learning

According to Harvard University, “in Activity-Based Learning courses, students do public service, fieldwork, community-based research and internships in conjunction with in-class work. ABL pedagogy aims to enrich students’ academic experience and learning outcomes by connecting theory with practice, and concepts with methods, using data and insight they obtain through engagement with the larger world.” (1)

Andragogy

The study of teaching adults.

BYOD

An initialism that stands for “Bring Your Own Device.” BYOD programs allow students to use their own technology (usually smartphone or tablet) in a classroom. BYOD is often seen as a way of solving budget concerns while increasing the authenticity of learning experiences, while critics point to the problems BYOD can cause for district IT, privacy concerns, and more.

Blended Learning

Blended learning is a learning model that combines digital and face-to-face learning experiences. The Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation defines Blended Learning “a formal education program in which a student learns: (1) at least in part through online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path, and/or pace; (2) at least in part in a supervised brick-and-mortar location away from home; (3) and the modalities along each student’s learning path within a course or subject are connected to provide an integrated learning experience.” It is generally accepted that there are four models of blended learning: Rotation, Flex, A La Carte, and Enriched Virtual. The Christensen Institute clarifies that “the Rotation model includes four sub-models: Station Rotation, Lab Rotation, Flipped Classroom, and Individual Rotation.” (3)

There is some thought that a certain percentage of instruction must be digital to qualify as “blended learning,” but there is no clear industry standard.

Challenge-Based Learning

Challenge-Based Learning is a learning model pushed by Apple that promotes the academic classroom as a think tank to solve authentic problems. It is similar to place-based education and project-based learning as a teaching tool.

Apple defines Challenge-Based Learning as “an engaging multidisciplinary approach to teaching and learning that encourages learners to leverage the technology they use in their daily lives to solve real-world problems. Challenge Based Learning is collaborative and hands-on, asking students to work with peers, teachers, and experts in their communities and around the world to ask good questions, develop deep subject area knowledge, identify and solve challenges, take action, and share their experience.” (5)

Cognitive Apprenticeship

Cognitive apprenticeship focuses on “learning-through-guided-experience on cognitive and metacognitive skills and processes” (Collins, Brown, & Newman, 1989, p. 457), instead of the physically concrete craft or trade that is the focus of traditional apprenticeships.

“The method is aimed primarily at teaching the problem-solving processes that experts use to handle complex tasks. Cognitive apprenticeships are intended to enable apprentices to learn strategies and skills in the context of their application to realistic problems, within a culture focused on and defined by expert practice.” (6)

Communal Constructivism

A learning theory “in which networked learners not only construct and assimilate their own knowledge from their own learning opportunities, but deliberately contribute their own learning to a community resource base.”(Holmes & Gardner 2006). (7)

Connected Learning

A learning model by Digital Media & Learning that emphasizes the role of social interactions as a catalyst for learning. (See “Connected Learning: The Power Of Social Learning Models”.) Characteristics of Connected Learning include: Interest-Powered, Production Centered, Peer-Supported, Shared Purpose, Academically-Oriented, and Openly-Networked. (15)

Constructionism

According to Seymour Papert, constructionism is, put roughly, learning by making.

That Papert is known to struggle with the idea of defining Constructionism by a “pipeline” of knowledge-giving hints at its nature–open-ended, learner-centered, playful, non-institutional, non-academis, and so difficult to describe in an academic context.

Papert explained that, while close in meaning and spelling as Constructivism, it is suitably unique:

“Constructionism–the N word as opposed to the V word–shares constructivism’s connotation of learning as “building knowledge structures” irrespective of the circumstances of the learning. It then adds the idea that this happens especially felicitously in a context where the learner is consciously engaged in constructing a public entity, whether it’s a sand castle on the beach or a theory of the universe.”

Papert went on to describe Constructionism as a kind of learning which “allows full range of intellectual styles and preferences to each find a point of equilibrium. (Papert, Harel 1991) (16)

Constructivism

A learning theory that suggests that “people construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences” (Christie 2005). (14)

Differentiation

According to differentiation expert Dr. Carol Tomlinson, differentiation is not a teaching strategy, but rather a way of thinking about learning. In terms of application it is the specific design of “content, process, or product” according to a student’s readiness, interest, or learning profile. (Citation needed).

Tomlinson explains that “differentiation does not presume different tasks for each learner, but rather just enough flexibility in task complexity, working arrangements, and modes of learning expression that varied students find learning a good fit much of the time.” (22)

In short, differentiation is the process of personalizing universal learning goals for groups of students. As such, it is closely related to (but different than) personalized learning and individualized learning.

Digital Citizenship

Karen Mossberger, Associate Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago, defines digital citizenship simply as “the ability to participate in society online.” (9)

Terry Heick offers a definition of digital citizenship as “The quality of habits, actions, and consumption patterns that impact the ecology of digital content and communities.” (10)

eLearning

Learning expressly through online courses and related digital resources.

Flipped Classroom

Stated simply, a flipped classroom is one where students are introduced to content at home through digital tools (usually video), and then practice it at school under the guidance of a teacher. This is the reverse of the traditional pattern, where students are introduced to content at school, and then practice it at home without the guidance of the teacher (i.e., More Knowledgeable Other).

Flow

A tenet of Eastern philosophy and thought for millenia, and more recently repopularized by Mihaly Csíkszentmihályi, flow is the complete merging of task and doer–a state of being where a body, mind, and task resonate effortlessly and result in improved performance and extraordinary satisfaction.

A useful example of flow from Diane Ackerman’s Deep Play:

“In Bone Games, climber Rob Schultheis recalls how he felt descending a mountain after a harrowing near-death fall: “The person I became on Neva was the best possible version of myself, the person I should have been throughout my life. No regrets, no hesitation; there were no false moves left in me. I really believe I could have hit a mosquito in the eye with a pine needle at thirty paces; I couldn’t miss because there was no such thing as a miss.”

Game-Based Learning

Learning through games (from physical to digital).

Gamification

The application of game-like “encouragement” mechanics to non-game entities. Put another way, it is making a game out of something that’s not.

Genius Hour

The allotment of a specified amount of time in a formal learning environment for the purpose of self-directed learning. (23)

Google Apps for Education

A collection of software bundled by Google that is available on a subscription model for schools and classroom. Services include Google Drive, Google Docs, Gmail, and more.

Google Classroom

Google describes their Google Classroom as “designed to help teachers create and collect assignments paperlessly, including time-saving features like the ability to automatically make a copy of a Google Document for each student. It also creates Drive folders for each assignment and for each student to help keep everyone organized. Students can keep track of what’s due on the Assignments page and begin working with just a click. Teachers can quickly see who has or hasn’t completed the work, and provide direct, real-time feedback and grades right in Classroom.

Classroom is “available to anyone with Google Apps for Education, a free suite of productivity tools including Gmail, Drive and Docs.”

Heautagogy

A term coined by Stewart Hase, heautogogy is the study of self-directed learning. (Citation needed)

Inside-Out Learning Model

A school model developed by Terry Heick and inspired by Wendell Berry designed to immerse student learning in local communities. Rather than an outcomes-based and standards-driven approach, it instead seeks local accountability, new knowledge types, and overtly “human” learning models.

Individualized Learning

The customizing of universal content (e.g., Common Core) for individual students.

See also Personalized Learning, Differentiated Learning, and Self-Directed Learning.

Informal Learning

Informal Learning has been defined as “any activity involving the pursuit of understanding, knowledge or skill which occurs without the presence of externally imposed curricular criteria. Informal learning may occur in any context outside the pre-established curricula of educative institutions. The basic terms of informal learning (e.g. objectives, content, means and processes of acquisition, duration, evaluation of outcomes, applications) are determined by the individuals and groups that choose to engage in it. Self-directed or collective informal learning is undertaken on our own. Informal education or training is distinguished from such self-directed informal learning only by the presence of some form of institutionally-recognized instructor. (Livingstone 2001). (13)

Learning Simulation

Often (not necessarily) digital, a learning simulation is a recreation of a context which allows a learner to bring strategy, tactics, and skills to experiment, play, or otherwise interact with that context’s manipulatives.

Learning Simulation Clark Aldrich defines a learning simulation as “an abstracted interactive environment (or) structure for education in which a learner can take actions and make decisions, and get ongoing feedback and consequences.”

Learning Through Play

The process of acquiring knowledge, skills, or conceptual understandings through play.

According to Johan Huizinga is the critical anthropological text Homo Ludens, play is “an activity which proceeds within certain limits of time and space, in a visible order, according to rules freely accepted, and outside the sphere of necessity or material utility. The play-mood is one of rapture and enthusiasm, and is sacred or festive in accordance with the occasion. A feeling of exaltation and tension accompanies the action.

See also Flow & Play.

Learning Taxonomies

Any framework for thinking (and thus understanding), including Bloom’s TaxonomyHeick’s Taxonomy, and Understanding by Design’s 6 Facets of Understanding. These taxonomies can be used to plan units, lessons, assessments, and other teaching and learning processes.

Mastery Learning

According to Vahid Motamedi of Tarbiat Moallem University, “Mastery learning is a method of instruction where the focus is on the role of feedback in learning. Furthermore, mastery learning refers to a category of instructional methods which establishes a level of performance that all students must “master” before moving on to the next unit (Slavin, 1987). Thus, through one or more trials, students have to achieve a specified level of content knowledge prior to progression on to a next unit of instruction.”

“Mastery learning is used in order to advance an individual’s potential for learning. Compared to traditional learning models, sufficient time, attention, and help are afforded to each student.” (11)

MOOC

An acronym for Massively Open Online Course, a digital course that allows asynchronous access to content.

Mobile Learning

The United Nations defines mobile learning as “Mobile learning involves the use of mobile technology, either alone or in combination with other information and communication technology (ICT), to enable learning anytime and anywhere. Learning can unfold in a variety of ways: people can use mobile devices to access educational resources, connect with others, or create content, both inside and outside classrooms. Mobile learning also encompasses efforts to support broad educational goals such as the effective administration of school systems and improved communication between schools and families.” (12)

TeachThought is developing a mobile learning framework and definition that will be released in early 2015.

Model-Based Learning

A learning strategy by Terry Heick in which learners analyze an existing model of some kind, isolate one compelling idea, and then transfer that idea into a new circumstance.

Personalized Learning

The process of designing a learning experience for an individual learner, including content, learning model, assessment forms, and mode of knowledge application.

Personalized learning can arise from any learning experience that is self-initiated and self-directed in pursuit of outcomes that are first personal (e.g., curiosity-based, self-prioritized, etc.)

Place-Based Education

Place-Based Education “immerses students in local heritage, cultures, landscapes, opportunities and experiences, uses these as a foundation for the study of language arts, mathematics, social studies, science and other subjects across the curriculum, and emphasizes learning through participation in service projects for the local school and/or community.” (citation needed) (24)

Play

Play can be described as a pattern of free and joyful experimentation with voluntary barriers.

Rather than a merely recreational activity, Terry Heick describes play as “a state of being” often “characterized by unencumbered, courageous, and joyful interactions with people, objects, interfaces, or circumstances.” Heick goes on to say that play is more a matter of “tone and possibility than form or function.” (citation needed) Through play, learners are able to develop a range of intellectual, moral, strategic, physical, or creative capacities.

In Deep Play, Diane Ackerman describes play as cultural and evolutionary.

“Our culture thrives on play. Courtship includes high theater, rituals, and ceremonies of play. Ideas are playful reverberations of the mind. Language is a playing with words until they can impersonate physical objects and abstract ideas….

For all we know, what we call intelligence may be a characteristic exclusively of primates. It may not be life’s pinnacle at all, but simply one mode of knowing, one we happen to master and cherish. Play is widespread among animals because it invites problem-solving, allowing a creature to test its limits and develop strategies. In a dangerous world, where dramas change daily, survival belongs to the agile not the idle. We may think of play as optional, a casual activity. But play is fundamental to evolution. Without play, humans and many other animals would perish.” (17)

Problem-Based Learning

Similar to challenge-based learning, problem-based learning is a learning framework that uses (ideally authentic and highly personal) problems to frame learning experiences. Problem-based learning, then, uses the problem to necessitate a need to know in the student, which ideally would create a sense of both motivation and context for the learning experience.

Project-Based Learning

A method of framing curriculum that results in students learning through projects (rather than simply completing projects). (3)

ASCD explains that the “core idea of project-based learning is that real-world problems capture students’ interest and provoke serious thinking as the students acquire and apply new knowledge in a problem-solving context. The teacher plays the role of facilitator, working with students to frame worthwhile questions, structuring meaningful tasks, coaching both knowledge development and social skills, and carefully assessing what students have learned from the experience. Advocates assert that project-based learning helps prepare students for the thinking and collaboration skills required in the workplace.” (4)

Question-Based Learning

A learning strategy developed by Terry Heick that encourages learners to form, reframe, and improve questions as they are gather information and adjust their thinking in response.

Scenario-Based Learning

Scenario-based learning is a mode of learning that functions as a social simulation, requiring students to use authentic contexts to solve problems. Sounds a lot like problem-based learning, doesn’t it? It is, but the scenario doesn’t have to be a “problem.” Massey University explains.

“Scenario-based learning (SBL) uses interactive scenarios to support active learning strategies such as problem-based or case-based learning. It normally involves students working their way through a storyline, usually based around an ill-structured or complex problem, which they are required to solve. In the process students must apply their subject knowledge, and critical thinking and problem solving skills in a safe, real-world context. SBL is often non-linear, and can provide numerous feedback opportunities to students, based on the decisions they make at each stage in the process. Scenario-based learning may be self-contained, in that completing the scenario is the entire task, or it may be the first part of a larger assignment requiring the student to complete the scenario, and then provide a written or oral reflection and self-assessment on the process.

As for the research basis, Massey University goes on to offer that SBL “is based on the principles of situated learning theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991), which argues that learning best takes place in the context in which it is going to be used, and situated cognition, the idea that knowledge is best acquired and more fully understood when situated within its context (Kindley, 2002)”

Self-Directed Learning

Self-directed learning is a model of learning where the student designs learning goals, pathways, and application. It can be used both formally and informally, for learning both academic and non-academic, in classrooms, homeschool settings, and workplaces. (See Google’s 80/20 rule, or video game developer Valve for more on what this might look like in a professional setting.)

As a phrase, it is often used interchangeably with self-managed learning or independent learning, where students execute teacher-designed learning processes designed from institutional learning goals.

Note: While at TeachThought we think of self-directed learning as something “whole” and entirely personal, we recognize the subjectivity of language, and the relative obscurity, opaqueness, and ambiguity of much of educational terminology (thus this page). In that way, one person’s “SDL” may be another person’s “independent project,” and we respect our own biases, and thus general impotence in the face of this problem.

See also Genius Hour and TeachThought’s self-directed learning model.

Situated Cognition

A learning theory that emphasizes the absolute and permanent relationship between knowledge and context, or “situation,” situated cognition suggests a taut relationship between what one knows, and what one does with what one knows (i.e., knowledge and behavior).

This creates a problematic collision between “the different instructional goals of ‘knowing what’ and ‘know how’ result in different structures and practices of our education system,” and harmfully “decontextualized learning resulted from separation between learning and doing.” (Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989).

Clancey offers, “The theory of situated cognition…claims that every human thought is adapted to the environment, that is, situated, because what people perceive, how they conceive of their activity, and what they physically do develop together” (Clancey, 1997).

See also, Cognitive Apprenticeship. (19, 20) 

Sync Teaching

A teaching strategy developed by Terry Heick that seeks to merge self-directed learning in an outcomes-based learning environment. Also known as Second-Screen Learning, the idea is to give students freedom to follow their curiosity (while adjusting for their own background knowledge) while still be requiring to “sync” with the teacher as the teacher sees fit (e.g., within a time frame, a learning target, etc.)

In this model, the teacher chooses what, when, and how the students “sync”–which would seem to suggest each student have their own screen, but doesn’t necessarily require it. Imagine a teacher is delivering “Content 1,” and each student or group of students are then accessing 1A, 1B, 1C. The topic could be the causes and effects of war, which could also act as the “sync point.” The students direct their own learning around that idea while the teacher facilitates, and chooses when (in terms of timing), where (in terms of space), and why (in terms of purpose) the “sync” occurs (i.e., students redirect attention from their screens to teacher as guide).

Whether this is done in 4 groups with 4 tablets, or 28 individual students in 1:1 or BYOD classrooms, the big idea is the same: students accessing (or creating) personalized content while the teacher guides and facilitates the core of the lesson. (8)

Team-Based Learning

According to Dr Rachel Maxwell, for University of Northampton, England, team-based learning is an effective, structured and learner-centred approach to teaching on-campus modules where students work effectively in groups. A combination of individual work, group work and feedback is used to create a motivational framework in which learners increasingly hold each other accountable for coming to class prepared and contributing to discussion.

Use your class time for more than simply covering content, and focus instead on providing students with opportunities to apply their learning of core course concepts to solve problems.

References & Citations

1. Harvard Education Center For Teaching & Learning

2. Clayton Christensen Institute For Disruptive Innovation 

3. The Difference Between Projects & Project-Based Learning from TeachThought

4. What The Research Says About Project-Based Learning

5. Challenge-Based Learning by Apple

6. Cortland.edu

7. University of East London Research in Teacher Education

8.  The Sync Teaching Method by TeachThought

9. MIT on Digital Citizenship

10. A Definition for Digital Citizenship (Heick 2012)

11. Mastery Learning: An Effective Teaching Strategy via New York University

12. United Nations ICT in Education

13. Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, finds, gaps, and future research

14. Presentation: Constructivism: A Holisitic Approach to Teaching & Learning 

15. 6 Characteristics of Connected Learning

16. Situating Constructionism (Papert & Harel 1991)

17. How To Create Learning Through Play (Heick 2013)

18. Deep Play (Ackerman 1999)

19. Dr. Jennifer Brill at The University of Georgia

20. Brent G. Wilson and Karen Madsen Myers at the University of Denver

21. The Difference Between Personal Learning & Personalized Learning

22. (Understanding Differentiated Instruction: Building a Foundation for Leadership Tomlinson, 2000)

23. Six Principles of Genius Hour in the Classroom

24. promiseofplace.org/ and nrs.fs.fed.us/environmental_literacy/best_practices/

A Dictionary For 21st Century Teachers; A Dictionary For 21st Century Teachers: An ongoing index of emerging learning models and learning theories for progressive teaching.

Здравословно хранене: тайната е в последователността на приемане на храните

Постете, приемайте храните в правилната последователност и забравете за лекарствата

Американският лекар д-р Стенли Бас започва да изследва връзката между последователността на приема на храната и храносмилането още през 50-те години на миналия век. Неговите теории за запазване и възстановяване на здравето чрез правилно хранене са изпробвани и доказани върху редица пациенти, включително и върху него самия. С постене и приемане на храните в правилна последователност, д-р Стенли Бас се е излекувал от болестите си, а не чрез лекарства.

Различните ястия не се смесват
Немският психолог Паул Грюцнер провежда експеримент, давайки на мишки три различни порции храна, първата с черен цвят, втората с бял и третата с червен. Малко след приема на храната били изследвани стомасите на животните, при което се установило, че трите различни храни са подредени в стомаха в реда, в който са били приети, без да са смесени.

Децата ядат правилно
Д-р Бас е провел изследвания със самия себе си. След като ял различни храни в една определена последователност, установил, че най-бързо се храносмилат плодовете, след това смесената салата, после сиренето и най-накрая месото.
Интересен факт е, че децата, оставени сами да изберат какво да ядат, обикновено следват инстинктите си и започват с най-лесно смилаемите продукти – от тях ядат до насита, след което преминават към по-трудно смилаема храна. От нея също ядат толкова, колкото апетит имат и я оставят. Чак накрая ядат протеинови храни, които се задържат най-дълго в храносмилателния канал.

Здравословно храносмилане благодарение на правилната последователност
Нашата храна може да бъде храносмелена добре само когато е приета в правилната последователност. Редът на прием се ориентира по това колко време е нужно за храносмилането на един продукт. По тази логика първо се ядат храните, които се смилат най-бързо, докато трудно смилаемите идват най-накрая.

Пъпеш за десерт? Никога!
Ако ядете например едно парче пъпеш за десерт, това ще доведе до екстремни храносмилателни проблеми – не само при храносмилането на пъпеша, но и на пилешкото с пържени картофи, което сте изяли преди това.
В нормални условия (на празен стомах) пъпешът би бил храносмелен най-късно след половин час. Тъй като обаче в нашия случай той е бил изяден след едно трудно смилаемо ястие, значи остава най-отгоре в храносмилателния канал и трябва да изчака храносмилането на пилешкото с картофи.
Но пъпешът няма да стои търпеливо и да чака реда си. Той, както и всички плодове, изядени в грешната последователност, започва да изгнива. Образуват се газове и алкохол. Тъй като за някои храни са необходими 4-5 часа за пълното им храносмилане (особено при комбинации между протеинови и нишестени продукти), през това време се увеличават газовете, появяват се киселини и тежки храносмилателни смущения.

Как да ядем в правилната последователност
В своята книга „Ideal Health through Sequential Eating“ д-р Стенли Бас описва в коя последователност се храносмила най-добре едно ядене.
Всяка група от храни (плодове, зърнени, месо, сирене, яйца, зеленчуци и т.н.) се нуждае от точно определени храносмилателни ензими. Само когато отделните храни се ядат в правилната последователност, могат да бъдат отделени точно необходимите им ензими, за да бъдат храносмелени оптимално.

Ако например искате да ядете месо, ориз, салата, сирене и плодове на едно хранене, тогава правилната последователност би изглеждала по следния начин:

1. За предястие – плодовете
2. Салата
3. Основното ядене започва с ориз
4. Следва сиренето
5. Чак накрая може да бъде изядено месото

Всеки хранителен продукт образува свой собствен пласт в стомаха – и то в последователността, в която е бил приет. При гореспоменатото ядене плодът ще напусне първи стомаха – след около 30 мин. След това неговото място ще бъде заето от втория пласт, този на салатата, която ще се задържи в стомаха още 30-40 мин. Следва третият слой на ориза, след него идва сиренето и накрая месото.

Край на умората след хранене
Всеки пласт се храносмила отделно, без да се смеси с останалите. Ако е била приета правилно, храната се храносмила бързо и без проблеми. Не се образуват газове и не се появява умора. Точно обратното, човек се чувства бодър и пълен с енергия.

Ако същото онова ядене беше прието смесено – малко от тук, малко от там, храносмилането му щеше да отнеме много часове, придружено от чувство на тежест, газове, киселини и какво ли още не. И всичко това само заради грешната последователност.

А хора с бавно храносмилане изобщо не би трябвало да ядат толкова много различни храни на едно ядене. По-добре е да се хранят по малко и по-често.

Основното правило на точната последователност гласи:
Колкото по-голямо е съдържанието на вода на една храна, толкова по-напред трябва да стои тя в храносмилателната редица. Колкото по-ниско е съдържанието на вода, толкова по-късно се яде. Водосъдържащи храни се храносмилат лесно и бързо отстъпват място на тези с високо съдържание на протеини, въглехидрати и мазнини.

Непоносими храни изведнъж стават поносими
Ако досега сте страдали от стомашни проблеми след консумацията на ядки, авокадо или плодове, вероятно сте мислели, че те не са добри за вас.
В действителност просто сте ги приемали в грешната последователност или в неправилна комбинация с други храни. Ако ядете ядки заедно с плодове, тогава богатите на мазнини ядки пречат на храносмилането на плода. Приети в подходящата последователност, тези два продукта изведнъж стават чудесно поносими и се смилат отлично.

Да вземем за пример прочутата комбинация от шунка с пъпеш, която често се сервира като деликатесно предястие. Пъпешът сам по себе си би бил прекрасен, но мазнините на шунката пречат на храносмилането му, което води до редица проблеми.

Соковете
Случвало ли ви се е да изпиете една чаша плодов сок за десерт? В стомаха ви вече има салата и картофи със зеленчуци, запечени със сирене. Върху всичко това идва и сокът, който иначе би напуснал стомаха за броени минути, а сега трябва да чака реда си с часове. Неговият „гняв“ заради забавянето също се изразява по вече познатите начини.

Най-често допусканите грешки при хранене, предизвикващи неразположение, отпадналост и храносмилателни проблеми:

– Пиенето по време на ядене
– Плодове (свежи или сушени) за десерт
– Смесването на сладки и/или сушени плодове с ядки и семена и евентуално с някакъв подсладител (мед, кленов сироп), както е при повечето видове зърнени закуски и мюсли.
– Смесването на сладки и/или сушени плодове с киселиносъдържащи плодове
– Яденето на сладки и/или сушени плодове заедно със или след висококонцентрирани протеини.

Правилната последователност според д-р Бас:
– Напитките се пият 30-60 мин. преди хранене. Препоръчително е изпиването на две чаши с вода.
– Плодовете се ядат винаги на празен стомах, никога заедно с други храни и никога за десерт. При яденето на плодове има допълнителни особености, на които трябва да се обърне внимание: Пъпешът се яде преди всички останали плодове, следват киселиносъдържащи плодове като цитруси, ананас, къпини, френско грозде, нар, кисели ябълки и т.н. и последни се приемат сладките плодове (круши, сладки ябълки, банани).
– След като сте яли плодове, трябва да изчакате 15 минути преди да ядете нещо друго.
– Зеленчуците се ядат преди храни съдържащи нишесте. Т.е. салати и зеленчукови ястия да стоят на масата винаги преди основното ядене, а не заедно с него.
– Ястия, съдържащи нишесте винаги се ядат преди такива с преобладаваща концентрация на протеини. Въглехидратни гарнитури като картофи, ориз, макарони и др. се приемат ПРЕДИ месото, рибата и яйцата.
– И не на последно място трябва да се има в предвид времето, за което се храносмила дадена храна. Това, което се храносмила най-лесно, се яде първо, а това, което изисква повече време – последно.

Време на храносмилане на някои храни
Диня и зеленчукови сокове: 15-20 минути
Смесени салати от зеленолистни растения: 20-30 минути
Пъпеш, портокал и грейпфрут: 30 минути
Други свежи плодове: 40 минути
Зелена салата: 30-40 минути
Повечето задушени или сварени зеленчуци: 40-50 минути
Зеленчyци със съдържание на нишесте: 60 минути
Житни, бобови растения и леща: 90 минути
Семена: 2 часа
Ядки: 2,5 – 3 часа
Обезмаслено прясно мляко или нискомаслено свежо сирене: 90 минути
Бяло пълномаслено сирене: 2 часа
Твърдо сирене (пармезан): 4-5 часа
Белтъци: 30 минути
Цяло яйце: 45 минути
Лека риба: 30 минути
Мазна риба: 45-60 минути
Пиле без кожа: 1,5 – 2 часа
Телешко или агнешко: 3-4 часа
Свинско: 4,5 – 5 часа
Тези стойности се приемат като ориентировъчни.

Съветите на д-р Бас за правилно и здравословно хранене:
– Дъвчете добре. Недобре сдъвканата храна изисква по-големи усилия, за да бъде храносмелена и въпреки това не успява да бъде усвоена напълно. От друга страна на организма му е необходима и повече енергия, което е причина за умора и отпадналост.
– Малки количества. Колкото по-малко е количеството приета храна, толкова по-малко време е необходимо за храносмилането ѝ.
– Моно вместо мулти. Колкото по-малко храни се смесват на едно ядене, толкова по-леко преминава храносмилането, а и рискът от преяждане отпада.
– Концентрация. По време на ядене не трябва да се гледа телевизия или чете вестник. Яденето заслужава пълното ни внимание. Трябва да се съсредоточим върху вкуса на храната и достатъчното дъвчене. За доброто храносмилане е важно не само тялото, а и духът „да разбере“, че в момента се яде. И в този случай няма риск от преяждане, защото човек добре усеща, кога се е наситил и може съзнателно да се откаже от оставащата храна.
– Естествени храни. Избягвайте храни, съдържащи изкуствени аромати и подобрители на вкуса, защото те пречат на тялото да усети кога е вече сито.

Източник: blog.dalia-probg.com

Учител на годината от Върджиния (САЩ) споделя защо напуска училище

The Tough Decision to Leave the Classroom


As the title of this post suggests, I have made the tough decision to leave the classroom for good at the end of this school year.

The decision is a painful one — both personally and professionally. It is also a public one, as I’ve been honored as recently as last month by the Waynesboro Rotary Club as its 2014 High School Teacher of the Year, my fourth such honor in six years.

In that respect, I feel an explanation is in order, as well as a prescription for what we — as a community — can do to right the ship.

Every workplace has its imperfections and challenges. I accept that. But public education is painted as a career where you make a difference in the lives of students. When a system becomes so deeply flawed that students suffer and good teachers leave (or become jaded), we must examine how and why we do things.

Waynesboro is small enough that we can tackle some of the larger problems that other school systems can’t. I want this piece, in part, to force a needed, collective conversation.

In doing so, I don’t want to come across as prideful or arrogant. I simply want my neighbors and friends to understand the frustrations at issue and what’s at stake for the next round of teachers and students.

When I came to this area in 2008, I believed I would be a teacher for life. My wife and I signed a lease on an apartment we had never seen and arrived only a few days before school started. Words can’t really express how excited I was to land a teaching job, work with high school students, and invest in teenagers the way one teacher invested in me.

That first year coincided with the first round of school budget cuts. Salaries were frozen and spending was slashed. This basic storyline has repeated itself for the five years that followed.

Over this time, I’ve lost my optimism and question a mission I once felt wholly committed to.

I still care deeply about students. I’ve worked hard to brighten their day while giving them an enjoyable and rigorous environment in which to learn. If this job was just about working with students, I couldn’t ask for a better or more meaningful career.

The job, though, is about much more. And I have very real concerns about the sustainability of public education in Waynesboro (and as a whole).

To make a real difference in the lives of students, raise the quality of life in greater Waynesboro, and attract and keep life-changing teachers, we must address five key areas:

1. Tear Down the Hoops
Our teachers spend far too much time jumping through hoops.

Every year, our district invents new goals (such as “21st Century Skills”), measuring sticks (most recently a “Growth Calculator”), time-consuming documentation (see “SMART goals”), modified schedules (think block scheduling and an extended school day), and evaluations (look in our seventy-two page “Teacher Performance Plan”).

As a district, we pretend these are strategic adjustments. They are not. The growth calculator was essentially brought forward out of thin air, SMART goals are a weak attempt to prove we’re actually doing something in the classroom, etc. Bad teachers can game any system; good teachers can lose their focus trying to take new requirements seriously.

These hoops have distracted me from our priority (students). I’ve concluded it’s no longer possible to do all things well. We need to tear down these hoops and succeed clearly on simple metrics that matter.

Over the past six years, I can’t remember a time where something was taken off my plate. Expectations continue to increase and we play along until we invent new hoops.

On a personal level, with 100+ students a year, a growing family, and two side jobs, I can no longer be a good teacher and do all the system expects of me.

2. Have a Plan for the Future
I stepped into the classroom around the time of a major worldwide recession. As the individuals and institutions responsible for this recession escaped accountability for their actions, school districts like ours went into survival mode.

Six years later, we’re still there. We have no plan for the future.

Earlier this year, the school board held its annual budget meeting. I left my second job early to attend and asked board members one simple question: “Is there any cause for optimism?” Each school board member, searching for a silver lining, effectively answered “no” by the time their reasoning caught up with them.

These basic mantras seem to govern what we do:

Just do the best you can.
We need to do more with less.
There’s no money in the budget for that.
We’re hoping things look better next year.

I don’t fault our district for a worldwide economic downturn. I do fault it for how it’s handled it. For six years in a row, we’ve cut, cut, cut. And for six years in a row, students and teachers have paid the biggest price.

When times are tough, human beings and institutions have the rare opportunity to reflect and refocus, to think differently and creatively. But instead of seizing the opportunity and gathering stakeholders for collective conversations and solution building, we’ve wandered around aimlessly hoping to make ends meet.

We should have a clear plan for sustainability. Instead, we’re really just worried about balancing the budget.

When we have a desperate need like football bleachers that have to be replaced, or turfgrass that isn’t up to par, we somehow find the money. We — through public or private avenues — meet those needs. Why can’t we find funds to address the areas that seem more pertinent to our primary mission?

3. Scrap Obsession with Flawed Assessments
I’ve seen teachers cry over Standards of Learning scores. I’ve seen students cry over SOL scores. I’ve seen newspaper and TV reports sensationalize SOL scores. These are all indications of an unhealthy obsession with flawed standardized tests.

SOL tests are inherently unfair, but we continue to invest countless hours and resources in our quest for our school to score well. This leads me to the following questions:

  • Do we care more about student progress or our appearance?
  • Why can’t we start a movement to walk away from these tests?
  • Why can’t we shift our focus to critical thinking and relevant educational experiences?

It’s tough to acknowledge that people in Washington, D.C., and Richmond (and sometimes decision makers in Waynesboro) develop systems and policies that affect my students and me negatively. But as they retire and sail off into the sunset, we’re the ones left with the consequences of ineffective measurements and strategies.

Our new teacher evaluations focus heavily on test scores. But while teachers are continually under pressure to be held accountable, there seems to be very little accountability for parents, the community, or district offices.

It’s only going to get worse, and it seems that we have no intention of taking a stand or advocating against flawed assessments. Instead, we have submitted ourselves to these tools that misrepresent student growth. It is a game, and it is a game I no longer wish to play.

4. Build a Community That Supports Education
Stop by the high school for a sporting event (and I love sports) and you’ll be impressed with the attendance and enthusiasm. Stop by the high school on a parent-teacher night and you’ll see tumbleweed blowing through the halls.

If parents and local decision-makers really value education (and there is a small portion of the community that does), student and teacher morale would be much different.

Our school and political leaders must help build a community that truly supports education. A real investment from residents across all neighborhoods and groups would change the climate immensely and allow us to truly tackle the challenges that lie ahead.

Unfortunately, the community seems disengaged with such struggles and more concerned with whether or not we’ll ever land an Olive Garden.

Until the community boosts its value of education…

  • How can we provide high quality to all students?
  • How can we build strong academic programs that meet student needs?
  • How can we prepare students to be productive citizens?
  • How can we successfully partner with parents and others?

If we can’t reflect the values of our mission statement, then we need to change our mission statement.

We simply can’t move forward when there is such little community connection to our educational goals. And if we can’t move forward together, I don’t want to tread water alone.

5. Fairly Compensate Educators
Compensation alone has not pushed me away from education. At the same time, the years of salary and step freezes have taken a toll.

If educators are as valuable as we claim they are (our district website says we “strive to hire and retain quality employees”), then we would make sure we take care of employees and their families. We must fairly compensate educators.

Keeping a sixth year teacher on a first year salary is not looking out for someone who looks out for students. For those like me, there’s only a $100 difference in our December 2009 and January 2014 monthly paychecks.

My wife and I live on a very strict budget. We are thankful for the quality of life we enjoy compared to other people in the world and try to keep things in their proper perspective. But the only financial reason I can afford to keep teaching is because of two side businesses and the generosity of family and friends. I’m not the only educator who manages extra work to make ends meet. Here are some efforts we’ve made to make this job sustainable:

  • We lived with one car (a car that was given to us) for 4 ½ years. During that time, I walked or rode my bike to school to save on gas. We recently bought a second car with money I saved from my web design business.
  • We rarely eat out and maintain our own garden to cut down on food costs.
  • We bought a $114,000 house that needed lots of work. This kept our mortgage payments in the $700 range, which is about what it would cost to rent a decent apartment.
  • We haven’t taken a vacation since I started teaching six years ago.

I love Waynesboro. I’m rooting for Waynesboro’s success. But there needs to be real, quantifiable change if we’re going to create a bright future for everyone.

A love for students and teaching drove me for the past six years. Now I’m watching my own kids grow up and am starting to think more and more about my own family.

What will I have to show for myself 10 years from now when I’ve missed crucial time with my own kids to barely break even and exist in a place where educators aren’t really valued? What happens when I dedicate my life to a place only to discover I’m part of their 10th round of budget cuts?

We need answers. I hope this can move us one step closer to asking the questions that will get us there.

Josh Waldron